Can We Stop Celebrating the False Pride of Diversity?

Well, I just missed it.

The LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ Community has been marching and shouting their “Pride” in downtown San Francisco all weekend. In fact, the festivities began days before I was leaving on a jet plane back to DFW Airport.

I saw the ad spots on TV while I was chilling in my motel suite in Redwood Shores for a week. Don’t ask my 87-year-old father what he thinks of the Gay agenda unless you want his honest opinion. “We’re not going to The City this weekend,” would be his simple reply.

Is he a “hater”? A “bigot”? Far from it. He’ll talk to anyone at any time about almost anything, and gently impart some practical wisdom along the way. Don't ask him about his sex life or ancestry and he won't ask about yours. He’s lived his whole life in the natural diversity of the Bay Area, attending school and working with all races. He witnessed the crumbling barriers to civil rights for the Japanese after WWII, the assimilation of hard-working Hispanics migrating into the state for seasonal farm work, the tenacity of destitute European immigrants and the hard-won mingling of Blacks as he navigated his own challenges of having a step-father.

He rolled his eyes at the impatience of the Black Power movement that lacked the finesse of nonviolent protests and legislative actions to reclaim what the Southern Democrats had stolen from African-Americans after the Civil War. Now he rolls his eyes at the latest “Pride”
movement.

For my dad, a Sheet Metal worker who also made my clothes and our furniture among other things, “pride” is the feeling one enjoys upon accomplishing a challenging task. It has nothing to do with skin color or sexual orientation or individual peccadillos.

Here’s the real test of “diversity”: when San Francisco hosts a weekend of celebration for the White, Heterosexual, Gender-cemented, Long-term Married, Full-Time Employed, Intact Families, then we’ll know that all diversity is celebrated. But it won’t happen.

The word “pride”, like “gay”, has been redefined for exclusionary purposes, not acceptance of all. The symbol of the rainbow has been expropriated to flaunt the very aberration for which the Judeo-Christian God condemned the entire earth.

I’m sure my dad has known many people who were other than a majority ethnicity, heterosexual, gender-confident, gainfully employed, successful in marriage, etc. They didn’t flaunt it.  Co-workers, friends, and family just went about their business, keeping private issues private, just as he did. Individuals were celebrated for their personalities and accomplishments, not their assignations.

When we start flaunting societal aberration, we lose the cohesive culture that sustains communities. When everything but the norm is celebrated and those who don’t participate are punished, we lose the very anchors that hold us in the safe harbor of society. This is where a sense of security allows us to use our boldness to accomplish great things in service to others.


In an article titled, The Downside of Diversity,

"Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam -- famous for "Bowling Alone," his 2000 book on declining civic engagement -- has found that the greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and the less they volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects. In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogenous settings. The study, the largest ever on civic engagement in America, found that virtually all measures of civic health are lower in more diverse settings."

Instead of evolving to merely accept the unique among us, we’ve been forced to throw parades for them, alienating us all and degrading the truest sense of pride - the dignified self-respect that results from our unique contributions toward a cohesive culture that seeks to benefit the whole.

I don’t celebrate diversity. I celebrate the proud accomplishments of those whose contributions to society foster effective unity that guarantees liberties for all, without the multicolored confetti.

Am I Hater? A Bigot? After a week spent with my elderly dad (am I allowed to say “elderly”?), I’m wondering if, by the time I’m his age, San Francisco will be hosting a Unity Parade for those of us who stayed true to traditional principles and quietly modeled the norm.

It's not necessary on my account, but I do wonder what that flag would look like. I'll take pride in the fact that my father taught me how to sew if I happen to come up with an appropriate design. In the meantime, I'm content with an All-American Independence Day celebration every year.

We the Future

I don't always win contests, but when I do, I like to brag about it.

Especially this one. Because it's not really about me. It's about the future of our Republic.

In October of 2016, I received an email push from Constituting America, promoting their organization's We the Future Contest.

I had just finished polishing up my Our Nation's Foundations lessons that I present every other year in the public intermediate school where I serve as Library Specialist, so I had the pdf updated and saved. Considering the work that this fine organization does, I decided to go ahead and enter the Best Teacher Lesson Plan contest, in the hopes that my efforts would at least be seen by those who promote Constitutional studies. Then, I promptly forgot about it.

On February 1, 2017, I received another email from Constituting America, congratulating me on winning the contest! At the end of April, I received a large box of goodies.

On May 4, I received the promised monetary prize of $2,000!

The best reward is knowing that my efforts will be promoted much further than my Library. My hope is that many teachers, librarians, parents and church leaders will utilize the lesson plan that demonstrates Our Nation's Foundations by creating a giant graphic on a wall depicting the Bedrock of Natural Law that guarantees our Unalienable Rights, the layer honoring the Rule of Law by displaying the original 17 federal laws in our Constitution, the five Pillars of Principle: Limited Government, Individual Liberty, Personal Responsibility, National Security and Private Enterprise, supporting our 3 Separate but Equal Branches of Government: Executive Branch, Judicial Branch and Legislative Branch. 

Here is the pdf: Our Nation's Foundations 

Here is a video of my PowerPoint, for older students and adults: 

Constituting America was founded by actress Janine Turner and patriot Cathy Gillespie. The mission of Constituting America is to utilize new and innovative means to reach, educate and inform America's citizens and youth about the importance of the U.S. Constitution and the foundation it sets forth regarding our freedoms and rights.

This organization encourages patriots of all ages to enter their contests to learn and promote Constitutional education by offering impressive prizes for the winners. 

While still in her teens, Janine's daughter, Juliette wrote and published two excellent resources for students: Our Constitution Rocks! and Our Presidents Rock! She continues to work with Constituting America to promote patriotism. 

As a Librarian, I encourage everyone to "check it out!" You may be their next winner. 

James Madison - Patriot

As a young man, James Madison started a literary and debate club before the Revolutionary War, researching and discussing political systems and current events.  After serving in the Continental Congress, he wrote our nation’s Constitution, committing his life to a country built on the strong foundation of liberty.

James Madison was a Patriot.

Why would anyone want to be a Patriot? Patriot: a person who vigorously supports his or her country and is prepared to defend it against enemies or detractors.

Why would we want to defend our country? Because it’s the only country specifically designed to defend our natural rights. Our founders established a form of government whose purpose is to protect our liberty.

What’s so great about Liberty? Liberty is the idea that you get to control your own life, as long as you’re not harming others. Most other nations throughout history have been designed to control their citizens, not the other way around.

The U.S.A. was founded to be ruled by We the People. It’s our job to make sure the government protects the Constitution that protects our liberty.

We the People need to know enough about the Constitution to make sure our elected representatives are doing their jobs properly.

So, if We the People don’t do our job, then those we elect forget that their job is to protect our rights, and they may start thinking of themselves as our rulers instead of our public servants.

Citizens who are committed to protecting our nation and Constitution are Patriots.

Are you a Patriot? Do you love Liberty? Do you want to protect it for future generations?

If so, memorize this oath and think about what that looks like in your own life.

“I hereby declare that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.”

Congratulations! You’re on the way to becoming a Young Madison!

James Madison - Believer

James Madison studied theology under Princeton University President John Witherspoon, whose teaching combined religious doctrine and the power of human reason.

Young Madison committed himself to religious liberty and was skilled at working with others of differing points of view.

His faith helped define his patriotism. Freedom to express one’s conscience, under the sovereign hand of God, was paramount to him.

Our Constitutional Republic was founded on “Natural Law”, defined as “laws of the Creator.”  This, primarily, prevents our representatives from limiting our unalienable rights, because they must answer to a Higher Power who bestows the true scope of our liberties.

Without an acknowledgment of and subordination to a Creator, these protections are dependent upon the benevolence of our would-be rulers. This was considered too risky for James Madison- architect of our Constitution.

Does this mean that atheists and agnostics can’t be true Patriots? No! But they must acknowledge that our system of government is founded on the existence and authority of a Creator, because this is the concept that limits the otherwise unbridled rule by our elected officials.

Our founders determined that our system of government would be best administered by those who had a commitment to Judeo-Christian principles. They realized that a Biblical morality provided the best rule for individuals who would be participating in our new Republic.  

The American justice system is based on Mosaic Law and the organization of its administration.

The vast majority of colonists were Christians or deists, very familiar with Biblical teaching, helping the new citizens understand and approve our Constitution.

Imagine if our founders lived in an age of memes, logos and graphics, like we do today. What pictures would they create to demonstrate to citizens and elected representatives how the “laws of the Creator” are the foundation for our nation?

Patriot Challenge: Talk about this with your family and friends, and create appropriate graphics to convey this information.

James Madison - Scholar

Young James Madison suffered many challenges to his health, but this did not prevent him from applying himself to vigorous academics.

He was well-aware that “Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.”

You don’t know how the things you learn today will enable you to be a leader in the future. Every bit of knowledge you obtain will help you in some way.

Besides making academic goals and pursuing them with all diligence, I recommend that you follow young Madison’s example by reading as many books as you can. After devouring his father’s private library by the time he was a teenager, his father sent him off to Princeton to expand his knowledge.

Here’s your next Patriot Challenge:

Make it a habit to read one novel or biography and one non-fiction book at the same time, at all times. Why a biography? Because the lives of real people are even more fascinating that characters from a novel! Section 921 in any Library are my favorite bookshelves! Not even the best authors can make that stuff up!

Patriot Challenge: Keep a reading journal and take notes on passages that are interesting to you. You’ll be pleasantly surprised and fascinated by the many unexpected connections you’ll find! Discuss those interesting ideas with a friend or family member to help clarify your own opinions.

You too will discover, like young Madison, that knowledge gives you power. The more knowledge you gain, the power you will have to govern yourself. Self-governance is the key to Liberty! It also gives you the power to help control situations and lead others.

James Madison - Protector

As a young man, James Madison was named Commander in the Orange County militia and elected to the Orange County, Virginia Committee of Safety. These groups were in charge of preparing the residents for defense and imminent offense against the British as talk of colonial independence grew louder.

Madison’s own fragile health prevented him from fully participating in militia exercises, but his astute and thoughtful planning was a welcome contribution, proving that no matter what limitations may plague us, there are always opportunities to use our talents and skills.

Patriot Challenge: make a list of your strengths and weaknesses. Jot down present and future ways you could be using your gifts and talents in spite of your limitations. Remember- humility is a strength! James Madison was always humble, allowing others to elevate him to positions of authority as they recognized his skills. Are there ways you can work to overcome your physical, mental or emotional weaknesses? Make a personal improvement plan.

Protecting our nation was a priority throughout Madison’s life. He was instrumental in writing the Bill of Rights, as well as the rest of our Constitution, protecting the liberties of United States’ citizens.

During his term as President, Madison waged the War of 1812, protecting our nation from British efforts to stifle our trade overseas and kidnap our American sailors.

A Patriot is a Protector. How do you contribute to the safety and liberty of your family and community?

James Madison - Writer

James Madison knew how to take up arms to fight any enemy of his family, community, and country.

But, more often, he used the power of the pen to persuade others of the duties and privileges of citizenship.

Effectively communicating valuable principles and policies can prevent many battles!

Patriot Challenge: Identify your core principles and those of your family. What is worth protecting and promoting? Are there principles that should be shared by all citizens to help make our country strong? Make a list.

With whom can you communicate these ideas and commitments? How would you share them with your peers?

Do your social media interactions clearly reflect your principles?

Are you communicating your principles to family members and other adults in your life in a respectful way?

Do you know that, as a citizen, your opinions and concerns matter to your local, state and national representatives?

Are they representing your principles? That’s their job! How will they know, if you don’t tell them?

Communicate your opinions respectfully and regularly to those who have the job of representing you as they fulfill their oath to protect the Constitution.

After clarifying your principles regarding government, write a letter or email to your local, state and national representatives.

If you don’t already know who your representatives are, find them here: Find Your Elected Officials

What Trumpism Has Wrought

March 9, 2017 was a banner day for those who have developed binary brain syndrome.

Republican Speaker Paul Ryan, in a pathetic display to sell RINOcare (repeal in name only) to his colleagues, actually said, “This is the closest we will ever get to repealing and replacing Obamacare. It really comes down to a binary choice.”

Ryan said the same thing last July, falsely reducing voters’ options to either Trump or Hillary.

On social media, melodrama is spreading from overwrought responses to political pundits who dare to hold Conservative icon Ted Cruz accountable to his promises. Some Cruz devotees have forgotten that the human brain can entertain the concept of and. Real life is not an either/or proposition. One can support Senator Cruz and hold him accountable to Conservative principles. There are a few patriots left who remember that vigilance is the price of liberty.

There were other options besides voting for Trump or Hillary. The real problem started long before those two degenerates became the nominees. It began when citizens accepted the false premise that we must continually choose between bad or worse. The only result we get from falling for this deception is further removed from Constitutional principles.

This is the method Progressives use to replace the rule of law with the rule of man. The plan is working perfectly.

How many times were we told that Trump would be less destructive than Hillary? Millions of Republicans bought into the false dichotomy and willingly opted for a little destruction. In order to justify the betrayal of nearly every Conservative principle, many “Republicans” and “Conservatives” overcompensated by becoming fanatical apologists for their new leader. They branded anyone who dare criticize Trump as traitors who obviously support Hillary.

Conservatism was turned on its head and distorted to necessitate blind devotion to Trump. This skewed philosophy now extends to President Trump’s policies. Republicans and Conservatives are condemned for using their own discernment or the rule of law to judge the President’s actions. We are ordered to embrace them, like loyal Trumpists.

It’s official - many on the Right have willingly relinquished their human brain functions and accepted the limitations of binary compromise. Conservatism, Republicanism and Constitutionalism have been superseded by Trumpism. This, my friends, is why trading patriotism for nationalism historically leads to fascism.

Those on the Left are busy entertaining the many ways they can sabotage our Republic.

We’ve just made their job that much easier.

The Test

I spent Friday morning covering or removing all the informational displays I have posted in and around my school library. Due to state and district testing regulations, all “instructional materials” must be hidden from sight during the administration of the yearly mandated assessments. On years when I display a giant graphic of a Federal Building representing our Constitutional Republic, this becomes quite a challenging chore.

Because, heaven forbid, we teach children to use the tools around them to help them be successful while they are being tested. As if after their first glance at these eye-catching, creative, laminated, informational displays, our students still notice their existence. Question from a student in March: “Mrs. Branstiter, where are the Fiction books?” My answer: “Oh, you’re looking for Fiction? If I were you, I’d start in the area of the Library marked with half a dozen ‘Fiction’ signs. But that’s just me.”

My afternoon was spent at a district Library Specialist meeting for much-needed practical tips and commiseration among fellow paraprofessionals trying to preserve our jobs by dancing as fast as we can to keep our jobs relevant. (In some cases, this means actual dancing, like hosting an after-school Tap Club).

Besides wrestling with topics like technology challenges and student misbehavior and celebrating small large and small victories on various campuses whose administration and teaching staff value our contributions, we received a legislative alert. This handout reads: “President Trump has effectively proposed eliminating all federal library funding…” Over $200 million taxpayer dollars has been funding public municipal and school library technology and “innovative” reading programs for years, without question, as part of line-item budgeting.

Of course, being one of the largest states, Texas has received a vast majority of these grants and appropriations, including federal funds for online research resources, grants to libraries, interlibrary loan programs, summer reading programs, technology assistance and continuing education for library staff. This information included a link to a video displaying all the communities in my state that benefits from federal largesse. Dots on the map kept popping up until the state was nearly covered. I’m sure residents of Nebraska, with a total population of around 2 million, feel gratified to know that their tax dollars are helping to fund library services for over 28 million Texans.

Do I think that public and school libraries are important? I sure do. Do I believe that literacy programs are vital for an educated citizenry? You bet. Do I want to keep my job? Yep.

It would be very easy for me to follow the suggestions on this handout and contact my representatives to implore the continuation of federal funding to my state, local and school libraries. And, for a brief moment, I considered spreading the word to my fellow educators and participating in a campaign to Save Our Libraries!

Then, I remembered that document I have to cover up in my own school library before testing: the Constitution of the United States. A quick study of the seven Articles within this document reveals a glaring absence of the directive to use federal funds for state libraries. In fact, the tenth Amendment is very simple and concise on this issue: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.”

Does my state value libraries? I’m proud to say that most of Texas cities and municipalities have made consistent efforts to promote and support local libraries. As a matter of fact, a spouse of one of our school district’s Library Specialists was just chosen as President-Elect of the Texas State Library Archives and Commission agency.

In the past decade, Texas public school district libraries have not received the same enthusiastic efforts, however. I have found that a large part of my job is to advocate for my own programs and position.

So, instead of campaigning for the continuation of federal funding for Texas state and public school libraries, I will be in more frequent contact with the TSLAC, advocating for continued support of library services within my state. Because state libraries are not a federal issue under our Constitution.

And even though our Founding documents will be hidden from view during state tests, I’ll continue to teach them to my students and do my best to remember them when I’m tempted to forsake the rule of law for reasons of expediency.

Imagining My Grandmother

I received a packet of photos from my father today. He’s 86 and wants to make sure his daughters get the mementos we’ve requested before he leaves this earth.

This photo is of my paternal grandmother, born at the turn of the last century near Sebastopol, California, apparently taken while she was married to her first husband, a French-American named Barbier.

It looks like this spunky young woman, born Mabel Amanda Feige, could be rolling a cigarette after dance or drama class. Her hair is bobbed except for one long spiral curl draped over her shoulder. She and her sister, Josephine, were actually taking turns dressing up in their brother's Navy uniform.

Before long, she’ll lose her husband in the influenza epidemic of 1914, finding herself a widow with a young child, named after his father, Harry.

This is before women have won the right to vote, but I doubt if this ever stopped her from expressing her opinions, political and otherwise. She’s a rebellious Catholic, eventually meeting a small man from San Francisco who will marry her, give her another son (my father) and drive her crazy because he seems to love the city more than his family.

My grandfather, Albert Engelhart, survived the 1906 San Francisco earthquake at age 10. He took advantage of numerous legally questionable opportunities to make a lot of money, as the City by the Bay was being rebuilt. When crime in the burgeoning city became a troubling issue, my grandmother wanted to move south, to the suburbs, but he refused. They divorced, remarried and divorced again - scandalous! She bought some land in Redwood City and lived with her boys in an unwired, unplumbed garage for the next 12 years, building her adjacent stucco home herself, with the sporadic and unreliable help of a male cousin. I remember marveling at the hand-carved beams and doors in the ceiling of her modest Mission-style home.

Mabel remarried and divorced my grandfather and eventually married Milton Stuart, a man my father revered as his stepfather, who tragically died of cancer a year after I was born. My grandmother suffered debilitating strokes by the time I was eight years old and was in and out of nursing homes until her death when I was 16. She cried when she realized she would never teach me how to knit.

Now that I have this photo, I prefer to imagine her as a bit of a rebel. Mabel Amanda was a woman who didn’t need the label of “Feminist” to express her individuality. Both of her given names mean “lovable”, but I have a feeling that she was loved on her own terms.

Remember that SCOTUS Decision on School Prayer?

Many Americans have joined the outcry to “bring prayer back to schools!” Well-meaning, morally upstanding patriots lament the day that government “kicked God out of our schools” on July 25, 1962, as a result of the contentious Supreme Court ruling on Engel vs. Vitale. This 8-1 decision determined that school-sponsored prayer violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”

Justice Hugo Black, describing the majority reasoning, interpreted the Establishment Clause as a means to prevent government interference in religion, extending this to include non-denominational prayer. Justice William Douglas, in his concurring opinion, expanded this restriction to forbid government financial aid to religious schools. This ruling, while initiated by a New York state disagreement, resulted in a nation-wide ban on school-sponsored prayer in public schools and a prohibition on tax funds for religious schools or school-sponsored activities in public schools.

Explaining his sole dissent, Justice Potter Stewart argued that the Establishment Clause only prohibited a state-sponsored church. He reasoned that, in accordance with the traditional interpretation of the First Amendment, a non-denominational prayer offered by school staff did not “establish religion”.

Interestingly, the majority opinion went so far as to add the observation that government involvement in religious affairs often resulted in persecutions and wars.

Now, 55 years later, there is a flap regarding faith in a Frisco, Texas school. About seven years ago, the administration of Liberty High School designated a classroom for Muslim students to use for 30 minutes to comply with their religious requirement to pray five times a day. According to Principal Scott Warstler, this solution was offered to reduce the number of Muslim students who were being dismissed from school in the middle of each afternoon to be transported to their home or mosque for their corporate prayer time. The room serves as a regular classroom during the rest of the day. Students of all faiths may use the room for prayer during the same designated period, although Principle Warstler admitted that it is not typically used for prayer by students who are not Muslim.

How does this arrangement conform to the Engel vs. Vitale Supreme Court ruling in strict effect since 1962? School property, funded by taxpayers, is being used primarily to accommodate the specific faith requirements of one religion. The school district argues that the prayers are led by the students themselves and the room is open to all faiths during that prescribed prayer time, thus remaining in compliance with the law.

The Frisco high school campus is not the first to offer accommodations to the Islamic faith. Schools in Tucson, Arizona, Riverdale, Maryland, and San Diego, California have all made accommodations for Muslim students for prayer.

Due to the high population of Muslims in Dearborn, Michigan, Muslim students attending public school are allowed prayer accommodations and early release from classes on Fridays.

So, faithful Americans can rest easy- prayer has been returned to public schools!

Parents may want to ask their own children how often they take advantage of this opportunity.